While
pondering my current job situation, I realize that I have been thrust
into a position in which I am required to hit the ground running, and
though it is always what
I wanted because such positions promise ample benefits, it is tough to
keep up and I am left wondering if I am in over my head. Having done a
small amount of research into the predicament in which I find myself, I
came across an
interesting article which for some reason has bolstered my resolve and reduced the pressure I feel to succeed.
This article of course illustrates precisely, one of the issues I
see with our current workforce, and I get to blame it all on one of the
ideologies I dislike.
The title is a little misleading because it is written by a
feminist author who seems to think that more feminism is the answer. I
disagree particularly where families are concerned, but also when it comes to the workforce
because let’s face it, exaggerated self-aggrandizement and selfishness
is not the answer because as this article shows it breeds entitlement.
Allow me to explain.
Allow me to explain.
Our
author recognizes that women are now dominating higher education
because they “foster female empowerment and success” and that they are
given opportunity or able to “begin
their careers at top law firms” as she so says about her female peers,
however that is not enough. Seriously? You are given every opportunity
under the sun save society doing it all for you, and it still isn’t
enough? Why? Because despite the fact that many
of these women “lean in” or “power through” and keep up,
is really the exception not the standard. These women are proving that
they can do it all because they are “super-human” and leave the rest of
the women in the
dust, therefore the standard still needs to change. So basically even
though women are successful in a “man’s world” or what I like to call a
functioning society, it’s unfair to women still because they have to be
super human just to play by men’s rules? At
least that’s what she’s referring to when she says male-dominated
patriarchy? Or to put it more bluntly, successful women are successful
because they don’t try to alter the fabric of society, rather instead
attempt to be successful within the current system,
and that’s bad because only a few of them are strong enough to keep up
with men but not really because, well… patriarchy. So what about all
those other sub-par women who either aren’t strong enough to keep up, or
are just too damn lazy to bother trying?
The
rest of the article explains that something needs to change, or and by
something the author means everything needs to change because even
though women have been given
more opportunity than men with education, with starting out in top
companies, and with companies still working to cater to their unique
feminine needs (providing child care, maternity leave, pay incentives to
meet their affirmative action quotas, etc.), it’s
not enough because not every single woman is currently successful in
corporate America, and by successful she means being paid more than
every man and having authority over every decision and man within the
system. She doesn’t outright say it, but the implication
is there.
Now
the level of solipsism this woman exhibits is astounding. I mean she is
literally demanding that the entire world revolve around not her needs,
but her desires and all
the other whimsical desires of all women out there. She knows the game,
and it has rules, and it works because many women who follow those
rules are successful. However she can’t be bothered because as she
states, those women are “super human” so to better
help the less than super women such as herself, the rules need to
change, and not only change so that a lowly laid-back gal such as
herself she can win, but so that she wins every time. Leave the bottom
dwellers of society, you know all the very essential,
vitally important but dirty back-breaking jobs to the peons (or men in
this case), women belong in all the top spots, where all the prestige
and money is made because well, they are women kneel before them. To top
it all off she demands it as if it is something
they shouldn’t have to earn but rather be handed on a silver platter
because it is their birthright as women. These are the changes she
proposes, and once society recognizes that then everything will be
peachy, for a time. By that I mean until she gets bored
and decides to push the agenda further. Until then however, feminism
has failed women.
If
that is what feminism has failed to provide all women, then one thing
becomes clear, feminism was never about equality, it was all about total
dominion and absolute power
for women and women only.
So
how does this relate to millennial’s? Well feminism has failed them
because that is what millennial’s want. They want it all. That is why
they are called the entitled generation.
Never has so many gone to school graduated, continued to college, and
finish with a degree. The problem is, that the education doesn’t
guarantee a top starting position, or even a management position, or
even a job. It is however, what they were promised by
the world’s greatest salesman, so maybe it’s not entirely their fault
for being so haughty, but rather the prior generation’s failure to
properly impart an key aspect of knowledge unto them, namely that life
doesn’t owe you diddly. If you are not part of the
plutocracy, the rich and privileged elite, you’ll likely have to pave
your own way to success, but along the way you still aren’t likely to
amount to jack squat.
So
please, millenial’s and feminists, stop demanding that we change
reality to suite your selfish and indolent whims, and focus all that
energy on something productive like
virtually anything else. You are (one of) the problem(s) with corporate
America, namely mediocrity and laziness in all we do. I weep for the
future.
No comments:
Post a Comment